Free trade is clearly beneficial. Basic economic theory and centuries of evidence support this fact. The notable declines in trade driven by tariffs are harmful to the United States and China.

The United States and China have been attempting to negotiate a trade agreement for a while, but as I am writing, no deal has been reached. The sooner, the better.

Tariffs – which are largely taxes paid by U.S. households and firms – have already reduced the volume of trade in both directions.

According to recent data, U.S. imports from China decreased from $123.1 billion during the first quarter of 2018 to $106.0 billion in the first quarter of 2019. Simultaneously, U.S. exports to China fell from $32.0 billion to $26.0 billion.

In fact, during this period, Mexico eclipsed China as the largest U.S. trading partner.

Free trade is clearly beneficial. Basic economic theory and centuries of evidence support this fact. The notable declines in trade driven by tariffs are harmful to both nations. Although the Chinese economy is more export-oriented than the U.S., American families and firms are also feeling the effects.

One thing that seems to be lost at times in the discussion is that, when the U.S. imposes tariffs, people in the U.S. pay more for Chinese goods, as tariffs are collected at the border and largely passed on to consumers and producers.

How much gets absorbed by U.S. interests depends on arcane measurements of the relative elasticities of supply and demand, but the bottom line is that we pay more.

Some of these products are consumer items, while others are inputs for U.S. goods. Household budgets are affected, as are firm profits and competitiveness.

When China retaliates with its own tariffs, U.S. exports become less affordable for Chinese customers, purchases are reduced, and U.S. firms suffer in the huge Chinese market. The current tariffs could add $500 or more to the annual costs of operating a U.S. household, and more are being threatened.

Simply stated, this stuff is real!

Even beyond tariffs are changes in investment patterns, supply chains and strategic plans.

Chinese investments in the U.S. have fallen sharply. Already, corporations have announced moves from China to other nations for manufacturing facilities to avoid trade complications.

In some industries such as electronics, divergence of the U.S. and China can affect global standards. If a Chinese protocol for 5G doesn’t precisely match that of the U.S., for example, enormous inefficiencies with profound implications will occur.

The more the two largest economies in the world can interact, the better they will perform, which generates advantages for virtually all nations. At the same time, it is essential to protect intellectual property, ensure national security, and keep the playing field level.

A trade agreement that deals with these issues and reduces or eliminates tariffs would not only positively affect the U.S. and China but would also yield substantial global benefits.

M. Ray Perryman is president and chief executive officer of The Perryman Group (www.perrymangroup.com). He also serves as Institute Distinguished Professor of Economic Theory and Method at the International Institut

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.